Diagnosis,
Assessment, and Treatment of Level 1 Characteristics of Autisms
Introduction
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
is often described as a multifaceted, multifactorial, and pervasive
neurodevelopmental condition. As the definition presents itself, the condition
characterizes itself with developmental difficulties. To diagnose the
condition, aberrant behavior forms and characteristics are prioritized. The criteria
focus on problems or deficiencies in societal communication, restricted relations,
repetitive types of behavior, and lack of interest in some activities. The condition presents itself in different
forms leading to the current reports on morbidity and psychiatric comorbid
frequencies. The commonly identifiable mental and psychiatric conditions
include oppositional defiant disorder, social anxiety, hyperactivity, and
intellectual disability. Medically related conditions that have been on the
rise and frequently reported include sleep disorders, epilepsy, dysfunction of
mitochondria, abnormalities in the immune system, and gastrointestinal
disorders. The effect of this condition is massive and extends across various
sectors such as education, health, labor markets, employment, welfare, and
social care. Due to the extended effects, there are high chances of individuals
suffering from economic burdens, especially into adulthood. If the focus is on
the cost of medicine or treatment, it is surprising to note that the annual
direct productivity and medical expenses are likely to hit $ 500 billion per
annum by 2025 in the United States. Because of this, there is a call for
adequate care, efficacious treatment, and support structures for the affected
families. Effective treatment is likely to improve the functioning of
individuals with this disorder, especially considering that the outcomes cannot
be underestimated. The research brings on board a literature review of individuals
with level one autism disorder. Studies have demonstrated that these people
have issues with socializing and communication. Even though they may develop a
conversation, it is often difficult to maintain. Because of the nature of this
level of Autism, the paper sheds more light on the diagnosis, assessment, and
treatment of persons with level one characteristics of Autism.
Literature Review
Individuals with level one
autism disorder have noticeable conditions ranging from communication
difficulties to socialization. Other people at this level find it difficult to
reach out and make friends (Masi, DeMayo,
Glozier, & Guastella, 2017). As the DSM-5 reports, individuals who are
diagnosed with this level demands immediate social support. Symptoms of level-one
Autism include the following:
ü
Lack of or decreased interests
in social interaction
ü
Difficulty to maintain social
interactions, for instance, talking to friends
ü
Signs of communication
challenges and problems
ü
Inability to give and take a constructive
conversation, even though there are abilities to engage
ü
Difficulties in organizing and
planning
ü
Troubles in adapting to the
changing behaviors (Masi et al., 2017)
Theoretical
Framework
The study by Masi et al.
(2017) demonstrates that the first time when autism spectrum disorder was
reported dates to 1943 when Leo Kanner published a report about the stubborn
nature of sufficient contact. In the report, Kanner included a study of eleven
children aged between two years and eleven. He describes the observations of
these children after the visit and diagnosis at his clinic as a devising and thrilling
incapacity to interact or relate to others who were present. Kanner brought on
board a distinction between this disorder and that of people with schizophrenia.
He managed to differentiate the two by use of various factors such as time of
onset. Kanner described childhood schizophrenia as the process of withdrawal
from healthy development (Masi et al., 2017). In
addition to the desire to remain alone, Kanner also observed that children who
had acquired this disorder recently (the earliest level) had unusual language
development with an ability to learn nursery rhymes and nouns. There were also
problems with developing communicative aspects of speech, interpretation of
things literally, and repetitive sensory actions.
In
1944, a researcher, Hans Asperger, printed an article concerning what he
thought was autistic psychopathy. In the article, he provided more insights
about children experiencing issues with non-verbal communiqué and public
skills. This report was important because it formed the foundation of Kanner’s effort
in the description of the notion and levels of Autism (Manouilenko &
Bejerot, 2015). The signs proposed by Hans were similar to those of Kanner. It
was not until the 1970s when the article penetrated the whole world after the
end of the Second World War. In 1981, Lorna Wing provided more insightful
remarks and thoughts about the history of the syndrome, which was proposed by
Asperger. In the new study, the condition was amended by the removal of the
term "psychopathy" and renaming it as "Asperger syndrome."
In her acknowledgment, Wing agrees that there are three levels of Autism, with
the first one being level one or the initial phase. Wing re-evaluated the
initial diagnostic criteria by highlighting a wide range of criteria ranging
from "Kanner’s Autism” (lower functioning) to the common “Asperger’s
syndrome” and evolving individuals who demonstrate some characteristics of this
condition. The current inherent nature
of autism and its differentiating characteristics among people calls for more
advanced diagnostic criteria.
Diagnosis and
Assessment of Level One Characteristics of Autism
The
diagnosis of level one autism first appeared in the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of mental Disorder, third edition (DSM-III) (Grenyer, 2018). The
description was primarily based on an inactive group of people with the developmental
mental disorder. The discussion by the author suggests that this level occurs
during the first thirty months of development and is characterized by lack of
responsiveness to others, slow or lack of responses to the varying
environmental stimuli, deficits in language development, and lack of
schizophrenic signs. Another study by Barlati, Deste, Ariu, & Vita (2016)
expanded on these diagnostic criteria by use of the DSM-III-R to bring on board
the inescapable landscape of the condition with the elaboration that the
disorder was not just limited to children as initially thought. The criteria
used in the analysis did not include those individuals with higher functioning
that only displayed the deficits after a certain time in life, other than the
early stages of development. The literature by Barlati in the DSM-III-R
diagnostic criterion recognizes eight out of sixteen possible methods for
diagnosis of this level of Autism. The age of onset is specific in
demonstrating the period when the condition appeared, for instance, during
infancy or early childhood.
The
DSM-IV was also released in 1994 with similar criteria as those used in
DSM-III-R of Autistic Disorder. However, the onset period was detached. This
criterion established the foundation of set strategies for Autism Disorder
using the outline by Wing. The approach simply involved the description of the
condition as that characterized by impairments in imagination, communication,
and interaction (Nicolaidis, Raymaker, Ashkenazy, McDonald, Dern, Baggs & Boisclair,
2015). Nicolaidis et al. (2015) and the use of the DSM-IV marked the increased
clarification and the specifics in Autism related symptoms. The diagnosis of
ASD, Pervasive Development Disorder (PDD), and the Asperger's Syndrome was
altered by being reduced into two main criteria, the Autism Spectrum Disorder
and Communication Difficulty. The growing and increased modification provided
more insights about level-one Autism in totality to the validity of the
diagnosis of Asperger's syndrome. Similar research by Duvekot, van der Ende,
Verhulst, Slappendel, van Daalen, Maras, & Greaves-Lord (2017) reflected
the growing concerns about diagnostic criteria used. Individuals with
Asperger's syndrome were believed to take a diagnosis of ASD without cognitive
or language impairment. The current diagnostic tests used for Autism Spectrum
Disorder (level one) are recorded in table one. Concerning DSM-IV, it is vital
to introduce pragmatic communication disorder as a request for the persistent
problems in the frequent use of nonverbal communiqué without limitation to monotonous
and restricted behavior. It is expected that individuals initially diagnosed
with PDD do not meet the DSM-IV criteria for level-one autism disorder, and
will quite often be identified with SCD (Duvekot et al., 2017). The new
standards were meant to offer more significant and advanced methods for
diagnosis and assessment of level one characteristics of Autism. Previously,
studies discussed demonstrated that there was a considerable variation between
clinical diagnoses of level-one ASDs, even though there were comparable
standardized measures and scores across the facilities in support of the use of
DSM-IV as a dimensional descriptor of common communication, restricted
interaction and repetitive behaviors. With the current evolution of DSM-V, it
is evident that some of the diagnostic criteria proposed by Asperger, Wing, and
Kanner remain ideal for level-one Autism (Garg, Plasschaert, Descheemaeker,
Huson, Borghgraef, Vogels, & Green, 2015). There is still a lot of
controversy concerning the different levels of Autism Spectrum Disorder, and
lack of a clear guideline about the association between the functioning of
Autism, diagnostic relevance, cognitive working and the need for treatment of
individuals who appear to have recently contracted the condition, especially at
their current occupational places.
|
Social Communication
|
Restricted Repetitive Behavior
|
|
|
Standards
|
Problems in social communication
and interaction across different sectors, by history or currently
|
Limited, monotonous aspects of
behavior, activities, and interests.
|
|
Descriptive examples
|
·
Lack of social mutuality such as
abnormal approaches, failed conversations, lack of interests in interaction,
frequent emotions and lack of response to mass connections
·
Lack of good nonverbal
communication behaviors meant for social bonding, such as non-developed
verbal and nonverbal conversations, irregularities in eye contacts and usage
of signs, and total absence of facial languages or messaging cues
·
Shortfalls in evolving, upholding
and appreciative relations, problems in altering conduct to suit the social
contexts, inability to make friends or share imaginative plays and lack of
interests in friends (Masi et al., 2017)
|
·
Ritualized patterns
·
Insistence
·
Monotonous motor actions
·
Stereotyped usage of objects
·
Fixed interests and restrictiveness
·
Hyperactivity
·
Lack of interests in facets of the
setting
|
|
v
These signs must be present at
level one. However, these symptoms may not manifest unless the social demand
overcome the limited capability or concealed by the adopted strategies in
later stages of development
v
The signs may lead to significant
social impairments, current functioning, and technical issues if not well
managed (Nicolaidis et al., 2015).
v
The symptoms cannot be well
demonstrated in terms of intellectual disabilities or developmental delays
|
||
|
Specifiers
|
v
Presence of absence of
intellectual impairments
v
The environment or genetic
composition trigger this medical condition
v
Presence or absence of verbal and
linguistic impairment
v
Linked to behavioral, mental and
neurodevelopmental conditions
|
|
Table 1: Diagnostic Criteria for Level 1
Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
Level 1
Necessitating sustenance |
v
With the absence of social
support, problems in mass communication contribute to major impairments.
These may include issues with interaction with friends, unsuccessful
responses to social conversations and many more
v
Lack of interests in social
interactions and making friends
|
·
Intransigence in behaviors may
necessitate interference with the normal functioning of the brain
·
Problems altering or varying
between activities
·
Issues with organizing and
planning, affecting independence (Duvekot et al., 2017)
|
Table 2: Current Severity Specifiers for
Level One Characteristic Autism Spectrum Disorder
The western
participants have prioritized the diagnostic methods discussed above for level
one characteristics of Autism. Even though the patterns are highlighted to be
affected upon by developmental conditions and biological factors majorly,
research conducted by Hobson (2019) agrees that both the cultural and social
factors are critical in influencing cultural acceptability and diagnostic
rates. An example would be the case of the United States, where extensive
delays in the developmental call for diagnosis, which is also the case for
impaired language skills. Therefore, given that the diagnosis process is
dependent upon contextual and social observations, it is not astonishing that
tools and phenotypes are not transferable to other cultures. In India, language
is not used as a diagnostic criterion for level-one Autism as quite often, boys
develop their language skills in life later when compared to girls
(Curdt-Christiansen, 2016). Similarly, in a majority of Asian countries, direct
eye contact is not applicable or a call for a level-one autism diagnosis, as
this is regarded as a lack of respect. Thus, a reduced eye contact would not
necessarily be viewed as a typical diagnostic feature in this culture.
Treatment/Interventions
Relating to Individuals with Level One Characteristics Autism
Irrespective of the high costs and
severe economic conditions, there are incomplete possibilities for treating the
symptoms related to level-1 Autism. Both signs linked to being a function of a
comorbid mental and medical condition and the diagnostic criteria are known to
worsen the ruthlessness of the appearance. While there are hopeful advancements
for the treatment of the disease, a recent report that involved methodical
review identified that many offspring with level-1 Autism were treated with
medical interventions (Khalifeh, Yassin,
Kourtian, & Boustany, 2016). However, little evidence is available to
suggest the importance and effectiveness of most treatments. According to
Fakhoury (2015), there are many challenges associated with the identification
of the most effective treatment for ASD. A systematic review of the literature
indicates that cognitive, environmental, genetic, and social aspects of autism
phenotypes produce different samples which reduce the efficiency of a possible
intervention. Other factors inherent in contributing to the technical nature of
identifying the best treatment include the absence of impaired study
participants, non-uniform outcome measures, and small sample sizes (Masi et
al., 2017). Cross-cultural variations such as deviation from acceptable or
normal behavior from one culture to another further complicate the need for
better or uniform treatment options in the ASD population with level-1.
Behavioral
interventions engaged in during the early stages of life are considered typical
in setting standards for the treatment of symptoms associated with level-one
Autism (Masi et al., 2017). According to
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Risperidone and aripiprazole are
considered as the most effective forms of treatment of the symptoms associated
with the disorder. In adults, the FDA approved the use of Risperidone that
helps in blocking brain receptors for serotonin and dopamine. This medicine was
found to be active and the most effective, especially in dealing with the
short-term effects of level-one Autism. Despite, it is critical to understand
that there are significant side effects associated with this form of medication,
including drowsiness, increased appetite, and high levels of prolactin hormone
(Masi et al., 2017). In 2009, the FDA also approved aripiprazole (a form of
antipsychotic) that helps in dealing with ASD irritability in both children and
adults. Aripiprazole, even though known for significant side effects such as
sedation, tremor, somnolence, and vomiting, is a dopamine system stabilizer because
it indices extrapyramidal symptoms when compared to Risperidone (Masi et al.,
2017). Therefore, the treatment response for level-1 Autism continues to be
primarily based on observable clinical behaviors. The focus is basically on
phenomenological approaches that have multi-dimensional aspects, especially in
their presentations.
Discussion
The research
supports the shift towards a more sophisticated and advanced analytic system
based on a profounder thoughtful of psychosocial and biological bases of
level-1 autism disorder. There is also a requirement across the research for
the analysis of many neural circuits, behavior, and genes. Even though level-1
Autism is still in its developmental phase, there is a need for a more advanced
and developed precision that prioritizes pathophysiology and etiology. Ultimately,
it is anticipated that the approach will recognize the importance of aligning
both the diagnosis and treatment to care and support of individual needs.
People with level-1 autism demand career support to improve signs of ASDs.
While the different dimensions of ASDs may appear as the main causative factor,
it has no potential to hamper the understanding of different groups or
sub-levels of Autism. The diagnosis of ASDs continues to be dependent on
observable behaviors or the phenotype of individuals. Currently, there is a
greater acknowledgment of the technical nature of symptoms, including health
comorbidities and medical conditions, because of the recent identification of
the relationships. The realization of objective measures of reaction will help
to contribute to the definition of subgroups of ASDs while at the same time
advancing the expedition for medicine and treatment models in varied
individuals. Thus, the psychiatric and comorbidity of the condition
necessitates this study. There is a need for advanced and more sophisticated
methods of diagnosis and treatment when dealing with ASDs. The substantial
effects of the condition are massive, touching across educational, labor
markets, occupational, and health facilities. Due to these reasons, there are
the quests for a growing body of investigation that would provide more insights
about the cross-cultural issues applicable in the diagnosis of level-1 Autism
and the other sub-groups. Perhaps, this research has played roles in addressing
specific symptoms, signs, and treatment of level-1 Autism. More elaborate
information about contextual factors in diagnosis are also discussed. Future
research should aim at providing a more detailed of the relationship between
sublevels of Autism and cross-cultural factors affecting the treatment of the
condition.
References
Barlati, S., Deste, G., Ariu, C., & Vita, A. (2016).
Autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia: do they overlap. International
Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 18(01).
Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2016). Conflicting language
ideologies and contradictory language practices in Singaporean multilingual
families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(7),
694-709.
Duvekot, J., van der Ende, J., Verhulst, F. C., Slappendel,
G., van Daalen, E., Maras, A., & Greaves-Lord, K. (2017). Factors
influencing the probability of a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in girls
versus boys. Autism, 21(6), 646-658.
Fakhoury, M. (2015). Autistic spectrum disorders: A review of
clinical features, theories, and diagnosis. International Journal of
Developmental Neuroscience, 43, 70-77.
Garg, S., Plasschaert, E., Descheemaeker, M. J., Huson, S.,
Borghgraef, M., Vogels, A., ... & Green, J. (2015). Autism spectrum
disorder profile in neurofibromatosis type I. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 1649-1657.
Grenyer, B. F. (2018). Revising the diagnosis of personality
disorder: Can it be single, clinical, and factorial. Australian & New
Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52(2), 202-203.
Hobson, R. P. (2019). Autism and the Development of
Mind. Routledge.
Khalifeh, S., Yassin, W., Kourtian, S., & Boustany, R. M.
(2016). Autism in a review. Lebanese Medical Journal, 103(3431),
1-6.
Manouilenko, I., & Bejerot, S. (2015). Sukhareva—before
Asperger and Kanner. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 69(6),
1761-1764.
Masi, A., DeMayo, M. M., Glozier, N., & Guastella, A. J.
(2017). An overview of autism spectrum disorder, heterogeneity, and treatment
options. Neuroscience Bulletin, 33(2), 183-193.
Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D. M., Ashkenazy, E., McDonald, K.
E., Dern, S., Baggs, A. E., ... & Boisclair, W. C. (2015). “Respect the way
I need to communicate with you”: Healthcare experiences of adults on the autism
spectrum. Autism, 19(7), 824-831.
No comments:
Post a Comment