Formal Paper
Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside
Iraq’s Green Zone is a publication by Rajiv Chandrasekaran. The 2006 release
illustrates the civilian leadership during the reconstruction of Iraq after the
end of the American invasion. In the book, Chandrasekaran explains the
development, management, and the challenges that the leadership of the
Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) experiences. The CPA program intended to
facilitate civilian administration in Iraq and to address the increasing
threats of insurgency in the country. The book offers a bureaucratic
explanation about the first year after the American forces overthrew the
administration of Saddam Hussein. During this period, the American army was the
legal occupying authority that was responsible for the administration of Iraq.
There was the need to establish the CPA within the Baghdad palace to facilitate
the administration activities.
The purpose of the CPA was to serve as a
transitional government after the occupation by the United States forces. The
United States was the leader of the Multinational Force during the invasion on
March 19, 2003. The development of the CPA was due to the United Nations
Security Council Resolution 1483 of 2003. The purpose of the CPA was to
facilitate judicial, executive, and legislative roles and authority between
April 21, 2003, and June 28, 2004 (Chandrasekaran 290). The program is
essential in the history of the United States as it was a creation of the
United States Department of Defense. The administrator of the CPA transitional
government was a direct appointee of the Secretary of Defense. The structure of
the CPA was in four broad categories. These are CPA North, CPA Central, CPA
South Central, and CPA South (Chandrasekaran 292). The operations in each
region were semi-autonomous, but there were a clear and shared mission and
vision for the reconstruction of Iraq. CPA had the significant role of managing
the economy of Iraq. The United Nations Resolution 1483 gave CPA the authority
to regulate the financial resources of Iraq; for example, the oil revenues
(Chandrasekaran 212). CPA also had the role of privatization of the economy. As
a result, foreign firms, most of the American multinational corporations, got
the opportunity to invest in the country (Chandrasekaran 9). Even though the
CPA had clear responsibilities, challenges arose in the leadership and
management of the resources of the nation.
The administration challenges are a
significant factor for the failure of the CPA transitional government. Paul
Bremer was the administrator of the CPA between May 12, 2003, and June 28,
2004. His role was challenging as he had the responsibility of deregulating the
Iraq economy, without worsening the social disruptions and encouraging a
nascent insurgency (Chandrasekaran 211). The primary failure of the program was
the inability to get sufficient foreign investments. Most multinational
corporates consider Iraq as a politically unstable society. Hence, it requires
a lot of resources and risk to invest in the country. The Iraqi populace was
also curious about the activities of the foreign companies Chandrasekaran 290).
In fact, popular public opinion is that the United States has the sole interest
of plundering the oil resources. There were contradictions in the mission of
Bremer. For example, the Iraqis were not ready to accept the economic reforms
as the CPA did not consider their input or opinions. The CPA had insufficient
staff and resources. As a result, the mission in Iraq was not successful. Even
though western civilization offers wealth and freedom, its realization in Iraq
is through violence. The use of military force to overthrow a communist
government is undesirable due to the loss of life and the destruction of
property and infrastructures. There is need to respect the dignity and create
understanding with the foreign partners.
Chandrasekaran explains the war on terror.
It aims at improving the security of the United States and the world. America
has a lot of interests in other countries. Therefore, it is essential to
enhance the international security through partnership with other countries.
The war on terror increases homeland security. There has never been a terror
attack on American society since the 9/11 bombing. Also, American forces have
been instrumental in preventing the activities of terror organizations in the
Middle East and African regions. However, the war on terror must be sustainable
to avoid the re-emergence of the terror groups like ISIS, Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and
Al-Shabaab. Involving the local authorities and communities is one effective
method of having a war on terror that is sustainable. There is need to address
the conflicts and disagreements between the key stakeholders in the war on
terror (Chandrasekaran 290). For example, the NATO allies should develop
consensus to have a standard position on addressing the terror challenges.
The American empire has challenges in
convincing other countries to adopt its ideologies, systems, and practices
(Chandrasekaran 219). For example, it is wrong to use military force to change
the centralized-economic regime of Iraq, in favor of the free-market and
privatization processes (Chandrasekaran 292). It is necessary to involve the
Iraqis in the development of critical leadership and political leadership. The
American empire has conflicting interests, especially in the terror prevention
activities. The Pentagon and the White House must adopt the counterinsurgency
program to hinder the re-emergence of the terror organizations.
In conclusion, the role of the United
States during and after the Iraq invasion is controversial. Some political
experts support the use of the CPA in developing an effective civilian
leadership to manage the sector of the economy. However, other political and
economic experts favor the involvement of the Iraqis in making the decisions
that affect their political and economic environments. The Iraq government
should choose the policy to adopt for efficient administration.
Work Cited
Dekker,
Martijn. "Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone‐by Rajiv
Chandrasekaran." Peace & Change 34.3 (2009): 292-294.
No comments:
Post a Comment