Evergreen
Enhancement Case Analysis
Name
Institution
Affiliation
Date
Evergreen
Enhancement Case Analysis
Problem Statement
Richard
Alpert must show great leadership as well as make a bold decision and choose
Faraday for the promotion as head of the managing VP despite his slightly low
performance when compared to Pace. Pace
uses a performance-enhancing drug of Adderall that creates unfair competition
to colleagues and competitors (Harris & Mead, 2012).
Alternative Solutions
Alternative
1:
Richard Alpert should
meet personally (privately) and discuss the concern that he has about Pace use
of Adderall. The discussion should be objective where each party should present
their views and positions including the reason Alpert should consider the promotion
of Faraday. This approach would give both parties an opportunity
to understand each other better and the impact that such actions has not only
to Pace but also the colleagues and competitors as a whole. Furthermore, the
possible impact that the company might have when such information becomes
public that might tarnish the image and name of the company. It would also
assert whether Pace knows the short and long-term impacts of using such drugs
or not, and provide an opportunity for change.
Alternative
2:
Richard Alpert should
convene an urgent meeting of all employees and introduce a policy of a
drug-free environment where employees would be screened for drug use.
It would also provide an opportunity and platform to educate the entire
employees of the impacts that performance-enhancing drugs have to their lives,
colleagues and competitors and possible legal and moral impacts. It would
provide a long-term solution to the problem where employees can also educate
those close to them about the concerns of drugs.
Recommended Solution:
The
best approach is for Richard Albert to meet personally and discuss with Pace
about the concern so that the two parties might understand each other better
and possible reasons why Pace is taking such moves and the impacts that it has
to all the concerned stakeholders in the Evergreen company. It is also because
of the limited time constraints that he has before he makes the decision.
Reference
Harris,
J. & Mead, J. (2012, Dec 1). “EVERGREEN ENHANCEMENT.” Darden Business Publishing:
University of Virginia.
No comments:
Post a Comment