Thursday, May 10, 2018

Formal Paper Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone


Formal Paper
Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone is a publication by Rajiv Chandrasekaran. The 2006 release illustrates the civilian leadership during the reconstruction of Iraq after the end of the American invasion. In the book, Chandrasekaran explains the development, management, and the challenges that the leadership of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) experiences. The CPA program intended to facilitate civilian administration in Iraq and to address the increasing threats of insurgency in the country. The book offers a bureaucratic explanation about the first year after the American forces overthrew the administration of Saddam Hussein. During this period, the American army was the legal occupying authority that was responsible for the administration of Iraq. There was the need to establish the CPA within the Baghdad palace to facilitate the administration activities.
The purpose of the CPA was to serve as a transitional government after the occupation by the United States forces. The United States was the leader of the Multinational Force during the invasion on March 19, 2003. The development of the CPA was due to the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483 of 2003. The purpose of the CPA was to facilitate judicial, executive, and legislative roles and authority between April 21, 2003, and June 28, 2004 (Chandrasekaran 290). The program is essential in the history of the United States as it was a creation of the United States Department of Defense. The administrator of the CPA transitional government was a direct appointee of the Secretary of Defense. The structure of the CPA was in four broad categories. These are CPA North, CPA Central, CPA South Central, and CPA South (Chandrasekaran 292). The operations in each region were semi-autonomous, but there were a clear and shared mission and vision for the reconstruction of Iraq. CPA had the significant role of managing the economy of Iraq. The United Nations Resolution 1483 gave CPA the authority to regulate the financial resources of Iraq; for example, the oil revenues (Chandrasekaran 212). CPA also had the role of privatization of the economy. As a result, foreign firms, most of the American multinational corporations, got the opportunity to invest in the country (Chandrasekaran 9). Even though the CPA had clear responsibilities, challenges arose in the leadership and management of the resources of the nation.
The administration challenges are a significant factor for the failure of the CPA transitional government. Paul Bremer was the administrator of the CPA between May 12, 2003, and June 28, 2004. His role was challenging as he had the responsibility of deregulating the Iraq economy, without worsening the social disruptions and encouraging a nascent insurgency (Chandrasekaran 211). The primary failure of the program was the inability to get sufficient foreign investments. Most multinational corporates consider Iraq as a politically unstable society. Hence, it requires a lot of resources and risk to invest in the country. The Iraqi populace was also curious about the activities of the foreign companies Chandrasekaran 290). In fact, popular public opinion is that the United States has the sole interest of plundering the oil resources. There were contradictions in the mission of Bremer. For example, the Iraqis were not ready to accept the economic reforms as the CPA did not consider their input or opinions. The CPA had insufficient staff and resources. As a result, the mission in Iraq was not successful. Even though western civilization offers wealth and freedom, its realization in Iraq is through violence. The use of military force to overthrow a communist government is undesirable due to the loss of life and the destruction of property and infrastructures. There is need to respect the dignity and create understanding with the foreign partners. 
Chandrasekaran explains the war on terror. It aims at improving the security of the United States and the world. America has a lot of interests in other countries. Therefore, it is essential to enhance the international security through partnership with other countries. The war on terror increases homeland security. There has never been a terror attack on American society since the 9/11 bombing. Also, American forces have been instrumental in preventing the activities of terror organizations in the Middle East and African regions. However, the war on terror must be sustainable to avoid the re-emergence of the terror groups like ISIS, Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and Al-Shabaab. Involving the local authorities and communities is one effective method of having a war on terror that is sustainable. There is need to address the conflicts and disagreements between the key stakeholders in the war on terror (Chandrasekaran 290). For example, the NATO allies should develop consensus to have a standard position on addressing the terror challenges.
The American empire has challenges in convincing other countries to adopt its ideologies, systems, and practices (Chandrasekaran 219). For example, it is wrong to use military force to change the centralized-economic regime of Iraq, in favor of the free-market and privatization processes (Chandrasekaran 292). It is necessary to involve the Iraqis in the development of critical leadership and political leadership. The American empire has conflicting interests, especially in the terror prevention activities. The Pentagon and the White House must adopt the counterinsurgency program to hinder the re-emergence of the terror organizations.
In conclusion, the role of the United States during and after the Iraq invasion is controversial. Some political experts support the use of the CPA in developing an effective civilian leadership to manage the sector of the economy. However, other political and economic experts favor the involvement of the Iraqis in making the decisions that affect their political and economic environments. The Iraq government should choose the policy to adopt for efficient administration.
Work Cited
Dekker, Martijn. "Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zoneby Rajiv Chandrasekaran." Peace & Change 34.3 (2009): 292-294. 

Friday, May 4, 2018

Rational Ground for the Belief in God


Student
Instructor
Course
Date

Rational Ground for the Belief in God
The belief in God is a question that has generated many questions among the philosophers. The conviction for the beliefs is pegged on the acceptance that the real issues are handled appropriately. Arguments have been raised to support the theological aspects that support the belief. The supporters of theism have developed arguments that have been in the forefront of safeguarding the basis for the belief. The rational arguments are classified into three categories. The categories include the ontological, teleological and cosmological arguments that have been developed to understand the effects of the aspect of the belief in God. The three categories have been very significant in understanding the contemporary philosophies that discuss religion from a special angle. The paper will provide an insight into the rational grounds that are embraced by the believers in the existence of God despite the presence of evil.
Ontological Arguments
The arguments provide a traditional perspective to the idea of the existence of God. The arguments are based on the premises that can be isolated from the experience captured in the world. The arguments are founded on the concept of God and make a conclusion that God exists. The arguments seek to prove that the nonexistence of God is an impossible phenomenon. The existence is independent of the fact that evil also exists.
The proponents of the arguments purport that God is the most powerful being. The argument is that God exists in both the mind and in reality. The superiority of God is attached to the aspect of conceivability in both the mind and the reality of life. The logical connection between the presence of God in the mind and in actual reality concludes the aspect of the presence of God.
Teleological Arguments
The argument is based on the idea of a deity pegged on the order that is found in nature. The argument is based on the capability of reflecting the design purpose and intelligence depicted in the world. The three aspects point to the presence of God.
God is viewed as the designer of the features that constitute nature. The design and implementation are beyond the capabilities of man thus point to the presence of a unique design that is superior to the human beings. The complexity of nature itself is important towards describing the functioning of the appropriate elements that define the capabilities of the human capabilities.
Cosmological Arguments
The argument is based on the aspect of the metaphysical and empirical elements of the universe. The idea raises a unique feature that points to the idea of a superior being that controls the functioning of the universe. The argument is because the features of the universe cover the aspects that define the actions that exist within the universe. The existence of God is therefore attached to the categories of the facts that existed before everything else and thus continue to exist. God is, therefore, the designer of the relations of the people that define the existing features in the universe.
The Existence of Evil
The problem of evil is real despite the fact that God still exists. However, the presence of evil does not point to the aspect of the nonexistence of God. The people themselves at will cause the first argument points to the fact that the evils have been.
The greatest argument is that the people themselves cause most suffering that human beings face. God had the choice of creating people that could not commit evil but chose to create them the way. God enabled the people to make choices on what decisions to make. Human beings are equipped with the capability of making choices that can be used to govern their relationships with the people around them.
Nagel's Argument for Atheism against Swinburne's Theodicy
Richard Swinburne emphasizes the aspect of free will that is characterized by the capability to express free will. Swinburne argues that free will is what leads to the commission of noble acts. The noble acts refer to the virtues such as forgiveness, self-sacrifice and the need to be compassionate.
The capability of the human beings to act nobly despite the evils that exist in the society is important to the success of the human beings. The instantiation of the pleasant feelings would only prompt the people to improve the existing environments that they occupy. The unpleasant acts serve to create an opportunity for the people to understand the will of God.
Swinburne asserts that God reserves the responsibility to express compassion towards the fellow human beings. God is the only being that is perfect from a moral perspective that is made possible by the capability to withstand the evils of the world. The unpleasant experiences serve the purpose of creating an environment that is intended to improve the world. The presence of the various cases of evil ensures that the people serve the purpose of serving God.
Nagel, on the other hand, asserts that the attributed discrepancy points to the absurd mismatch that is viewed from the aspect of known evil people are given the opportunity to express themselves. The mismatch in the lives of the individuals is key to the attainment of the desired goals of the organization. Nagel asserts that there is no individual that is capable of meeting the desired goals of humanity.
He believes that there is no individual that can go through suffering for his or her free will. The aspect of self-love is the biggest acceptance that serves the purpose of retaining the desired goals of the study. He asserts that the choice of evil is not caused by the desired goals of the community. The people have the responsibility of accepting the rules of nature and accepting the desired goals designed to address the arising challenges.
Nagel’s arguments are attempting to negate the assertions placed by Swinburne on the assertions that God allows for the people to commit evil for improving the world. “An individual is supposed to behold and share on the glory of God” (Pereboom 8). The arguments are designed to ignore the aspect of people’s total control of their actions. Nagel believes that God plays no role and that the people themselves make all the decisions.
All human beings are assigned the responsibility of meeting the desired goals of the processes. The people’s desires to commit good are guided by the intrinsic good of the need to have the perfect source of happiness. The possibility of God taking a center stage is therefore not seen as an important effort that seeks to attain the desired goals.
Sufficiency of Swinburne’s Response
Swinburne attempts to explain the role of evil in shaping the virtues of the world. He asserts that the aspect of evil is what drives the success of the human life. The organization or the human society is intended to create a scenario that is built on the capability of meeting the desired goals of the organization. The presence of the evils offer the focal point that can be used in challenging the aspect of theism (Pereboom 24).
The people around the world embrace nobility as the goal that is meant to ensure that the noble actions are encouraged. The desire to serve Gods purpose is the biggest motivation behind the aspect of God’s will. The creation of favorable environment is the biggest motivation behind the people ensuring that the world remains habitable for the diverse population of the human beings. The problem of evil is meant to ensure that the sufficient efforts are made towards meeting the desired set of the goals. God has the right of taking any decision that the individual might have in their minds. The presence of evil does not imply the absence of God in any way.
In conclusion, the assertions made by Swinburne are valid and qualify to be treated as such. The response that he gives towards the idea of the presence of God is sufficient. He explains that the human being makes the choice to commit a wrong action and is not in God's plan to interrupt such thoughts.



Work Cited
Pereboom, Derk. "Libertarianism and Theological Determinism." Free Will and Theism: Connections, Contingencies, and Concerns (2016): 112-31.

Tuesday, May 1, 2018

Analysis of Beating the Street and Rich Dad, Poor Dad


Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Analysis of Beating the Street and Rich Dad, Poor Dad
Peter Lynch’s Beating the Street
Summary of the Book
To every sane individual, the family is the most important part of their life. Unfortunately, many professionals are often too engrossed in growing own careers but at the expense of own families. In the book, Lynch acknowledges that he did not spend as much quality time as is desirable but is working on it after retirement (12). He uses the analogy of seventh grade students to underscore that anyone can make it big in financial investments but the key is keeping it simple by investing in companies that one understands how they work (Lynch 25). In the second chapter, the book cautions readers against listening too keenly on market analysts who are always pessimistic. He acknowledges that, “Even after good news is made public, Wall Street can be slow to react” (Lynch 252). Financial markets suffer crashes when stocks are valued too high but understanding the dynamics of a specific set of firms can present the perfect opportunity for an investor to buy even when it appears as the best moment to sell.    
            There are some financial investment options that seem popular with many American investors. Lynch cautions against following such trails by pointing out that bond funds do not offer as much returns as some readily available direct investment tools such as stocks (46-47). He points out that, “The reason that stocks do better than bonds is not hard to fathom” (Lynch 42). These ensure a definite ROI and do not require one to research or manage to profit from them. There are many mutual funds in operations across the U.S. though, many of them are duds. Lynch points out that getting a good mutual fund demands as much research as that which is necessary to ascertain a good stock option (51). However, finding a good firm is not always hard as admirable management operations are thrifty and are careful not to use resources in conducting glamorous campaigns. This implies that while stocks are better than bond funds, a knowledgeable investor will opt for shares as opposed to bonds.
            Big firms were once small companies. Lynch advises readers to focus more on understanding the opportunities presented to small companies in future as they avail massive avenues for high returns as opposed to large firms with very limited chances for expansion (70). It is common for investors to lose money in stocks. The key to good gains is to study fundamentals when the situation seems to deteriorate, it is ill advised to hold or otherwise buy its shares while performance is on the decline. Lynch points out why he preferred investing in cyclical organizations (70). These are entities whose performance is closed dependent on the manner a nation’s economy performs. When there are good times, they perform exceptionally well but in times of recession, their profit margins are hit hard. Investing in such firms in times of economic uncertainty often resulted in Lynch making huge earnings from investing in them.
Utility firms which are not doing so well are also a great investment opportunity for the individual investor. Even in tumultuous times the government will bail out such firms and their importance to an economy implies that at some time, it will often rise again ensuring huge returns for once low buys (Lynch 90). There are times when publicly owned firms are privatized. The initial stock offering is nearly always presented at below book value making them very worthy buys. New fast food firms are always good buys as they have the capacity to expand greatly in a very short while (Lynch 70). It is prudent for every investor to reassess own portfolio every half year to determine the performance of each firm invested in. this enables the investor decide whether to buy more of a given stock or dispose of it in to improve their financial position.
Analysis of Lynch’s Book
            It is imperative to note that Beating the Street remains a very applicable piece of literature with great educational benefits to readers regardless of personal acumen in financial investments. It is simply written and veils the massive complexities potential investor often associate with the field. The principles Lynch claims to have employed over the years working with Magellan Fund are straightforward and the analysis is objective in nature. Lynch’s book is full of ideas on the best investment frameworks. With all the principles aligned with the experiences Lynch encountered, the book is highly useful to investors or those who would want to understand the dynamics of the market. Reading the book, one is overwhelmed with the body of knowledge developed and conceptualized. To ease the process of investing for people, Lynch has filtered firms into slow growers, cyclicals, asset opportunities, fast growers, non-growers, and stalwarts. The filtration helps the reader to comprehend the nature and growth magnitude of the organizations. Moreover, Lynch has developed numerous helpful principles for investors such as investing in shares rather than bonds, venturing in solid stocks, looking at stocks for their value, and investing in areas where one has already ventured into.
From the ideas extrapolated in the book, Peter Lynch believes that investors have more freedom to act autonomously as well as study the market. The flexibility that individual investors act with gives them a competitive edge to research markets extensively; thus, manage to discover profitable ventures. The book contends that investors should apply local knowledge to dig possible venture options and then getting familiar with the market dynamics. In illustrating how to apply local knowledge, Lynch asserts, “It’s perilous to invest in a cyclical without having a working knowledge of the industry” (185). Consequently, the most significant and timeless principle developed by Lynch is to venture into the known. A person who invests in a firm they know well will likely have higher growth prospects than a fund manager or a person without that local knowledge. In this regard, the book is helpful in understanding where to invest, the appropriate time, and the processes to undertake.
            National economies are presently more interlinked to the global markets as was the case during Lynch’s tenure at Magellan Fund. However, the reactions of the stock markets in response to times of economic upheavals remain the same. This implies that the content contained in the book remains relevant today. Lynch takes an honest approach into explaining why people should not consider investing in financial markets as easy as opting for stock markets (Lynch 70). Over the course of 13 years with the successful fund, Lynch amassed great skill and expertise in understanding what made him successful from the times of loss in his early years through to his time of departure (Lynch 12). For a keen investor, it is evident that each chapter avails timeless advice on specific subject areas. The book’s main theme revolves about Lynch’s dedicated commitment towards dissecting common stock securities for careful analysis; thus, informing him which organizations are sound enough to invest in (Lynch 14). This implies that Lynch only opted to invest in firms of which he had a solid understanding that they are operating a solid business. For instance, he noted that “The $31 million that pier 1 received for selling half of sunbelt was $6 million more than it had paid to acquire all of sunbelt in 1990” (Lynch 133). To reach such a decision, Lynch notes that he was not only concerned in the internal affairs of an entity but also how it positioned itself in the external environment awash with numerous and significant dynamics (14). More importantly, the book champions for investors to diversify investments as opposed on a particular form of financial instrument.
            Upon analysis of this book, it is clear that investors are encouraged to be meticulous in the manner they select stocks to invest in. Lynch proposes a bottom up tactic where a particular prospect is picked out and keenly assessed. Lynch supports a straightforward way of doing this which entails employing personal experiences such as how a consumer demographic is reacting to its products (20). Understanding more about the company’s organizational structure, its strategies, and attitudes on operational costs allows an individual investor to estimate its trajectory for future profitability and growth. For instance, Lynch notes that a firm can express its quest for improved earnings by raising commodity prices, cutting production costs, expanding into novel markets, focusing on old markets, or selling off, closing, or revamping loss-making divisions.
            In most developed economies today, it is evident that small companies, especially start-up business with radically innovative ideas, products, and services exhibit phenomenal growth trends as opposed to large firms that have been around for a long time. Lynch provides that the investments he made from purchasing stocks in smaller companies that became big after a while brought him memorable profits (70). Fast growers, asset opportunities, cyclicals, and turnarounds are some of the firms Lynch encourages investors to select for consideration prior to purchasing stocks. However, Lynch notes that it is critical for one to gather vital information about their strategic variety as each tends to react differently given the dynamics prevailing in the external environment (132-133). Investors are encouraged to avoid stocks of stalwarts and slowly growing enterprises.
            There are numerous ways to attain data on the true value of a company’s stock. Upon analyzing Lynch’s work, it is clear to see that a criterion for selecting which stocks to purchase is a must for every keen investor. Lynch encourages people to consider organizations in terms of financial performance which is easily obtainable through different media. For instance, firms are obligated to publish financial reports in which one can assess year on year earnings and growth in revenues (31). The price earnings ratio is an important instrument which enables the investor to determine whether stock illustrate an entity’s true value relative to its performance in the internal and external settings. Others include net cash per share, dividend and payout ratios, debt to equity ratios, and inventories. Based on the information provided throughout the book, people should at least read to understand the dynamics that shape investments.
Assessing the Rich Dad, Poor Dad
Summary of Kiyosaki’s Book
            Young people from wealthy families learn by example from their parents on how to make money rather than spend it while middle class families often only believe that education is the key to riches. The poor lack in both areas and commonly tell their kids, “Stay in school and study hard” (Kiyosaki 2). Rich Dad, Poor Dad is an iconic book which has to date offered valuable insights to its readers especially finance students with valuable ideals of how to ensure healthy personal finances.  
            In the book, Kiyosaki names his poor dad as a man who excelled exceptionally well in his educational endeavors (9). In contrast to widespread public perception, his rich dad did not do well in school in relation to the other one yet he became immensely prosperous. Kiyosaki’s writings are established on the financial principles learned from the rich father in the light of failures and mistakes witnessed in the poor dad (Kiyosaki 11). The rich dad happened to be Kiyosaki’s biological father’s best friend. As Kiyosaki grew up, he got to learn from the rich father the importance of running multiple businesses, managing employees, and investing in real estate towards increasing his sources of passive income. Kiyosaki desired the knowledge his rich father possessed and he was taught in the best possible way, practically (12-13). Through a succession of lessons coupled with jobs that availed rich experiences, the mentored one came to the understanding that rich people earn money in a way that was profoundly different from how poor people treated money.
            There is a general misconception among many people that one can only make money through earning a huge income. The book rubbishes this concept by providing that it is because of the wrong mindset that most individual have a problem overcoming (Kiyosaki 14). Out of fear and greed, persons bent on making money from earning a salary tend to suffer poverty out of ignorance by making comments like “I'm not interested in money, or Money doesn't matter” (Kiyosaki 5). The poor tend to be comfortable gaining a paycheck and paying up for expenses without questioning the status quo. Conversely, the rich take risks whereby they bravely invest incomes on opportunities that ensure financial freedom in the long term.
            Financial literacy is the foundation of financial freedom. Kiyosaki learned that the rich dad understands the significance of building an asset base while avoiding runway liabilities (46). Kiyosaki points out that the game of monopoly is a great starting point to grasp the realities of how to make wealth in a way that money works to make more money. Fourth, Kiyosaki noted that rather than spend money, the rich are more concerned with using much of their time seeking ways to make more money through informed investments (57). Besides, the rich often seek way to invent or create new sources of money (Kiyosaki 70). They generate ideas that evolve into business which employ people who in this case are the poor and have to commit time as well as resources in exchange for a salary. Therefore, the wealthy are persons who are investors and run businesses. Lastly, Kiyosaki deduces that the rich are committed to continuously learning which enables them to pinpoint opportunities for growing the money they have already made. On the contrary, the poor have to approach the rich in order to gain money in the form of remunerations. The way the two groups are very different as the rich do not work to make money but rather endear to learn how to make money. However, the book provides that the poor can seek to be frugal and save enough money to venture into means for investing in return for a passive income.
Analysis of Kiyosaki’s Book
The book is an inspirational to many people but it is an individual finance assessment told from a framework of a parable. Kiyosaki provides a complete reconsidering of the workings of money. In this regard, the book does not refer to an asset as a valuable thing but rather as something that creates cash flow. This thinking shows that one cannot regard some possessions such as a home as an asset as they do not merely generate cash flow. Secondly, the advice given throughout the book is helpful but it is a self-help structure meaning the ideas might not necessarily work. In fact, the ideas presented are not applicable mindsets but rather are lessons positioned as counterintuitive disclosures. Moreover, Kiyosaki has presented some lessons in a myth-like presentation through an individual success story. Kiyosaki has draped the story in the cloak of education illustrating meaning most of the ideas sound promising only on paper. Kiyosaki asserts that people should buy assets that generate cash flow to finance other purchases (62). Thus, the revolving idea is to acquire income-generating assets but doing so today involves a lot of speculation. Kiyosaki provides a significant logic that a people will never learn money-management techniques in school. However, he advises people to enroll in programs offered by Rich Dad Company to access financial quadrants.
Kiyosaki has developed numerous principles in the book such as rich people work to learn things that they can apply to make money and assets should generate income while a liability is something with costs. Furthermore, Kiyosaki tells people to mind their business, dodge taxes, and invent money. However, the principle on dodging taxes is out rightly wrong since all the ideas offered relate to delaying or minimizing taxation. However, for an objective reader, Kiyosaki’s book is a very insightful piece of literature. It offers a great starting point for persons keen on understanding the importance of financial literacy and using the rich advice contained therein to seek financial independence. This is an aspect of life that is rarely delved into during the many years an individual may spend in the educational system (Kiyosaki 3). In most cases, it is only thinly discussed to the effect that it becomes negligible. Kiyosaki highlights that this is the major problem with the contemporary school system extrapolating, “My highly educated but poor dad struggled financially all his life. It was a singular point of view that made all the difference” (Kiyosaki 22). However, there is the implication that his biological father gained little from having an exceptionally long career as an educator as opposed to becoming an investor.
From a personal standpoint, there is more to life other than creating life. There are more rewards to a person’s inner self that can only be begotten from nurturing others. However, it is prudent to observe that Kiyosaki’s core purpose is to focus on how to ensure financial independence by appreciating that it is better to invest rather than to spend (Kiyosaki 33). At the same time, Kiyosaki underscores the importance of assets and the challenges associated resulting from the accrual of liabilities. In the instance that a father commits a child to the education system and ensures that they study and excel in their education; he has made a worthy investment. He can thus be proud of and more significantly presents a basis for financial independence for the young one. Conversely, where such an investment in education does not favor the child and they performs dismally, then this can be accounted for as a loss. Rather than committing funds to such an endeavor, it would be more worthwhile to equip that young person with on hands experiences that pave the way for robust financial literacy lessons. However, Kiyosaki fails to understand that some assets irrespective of their ability to generate cash flow are important.
Fear is the primary reason people are unable to reach the pinnacle of their life’s quest. Most people tend to have the wrong idea concerning what entrepreneurship entails. They believe that it is far better to work for a company rather than to own it. According to Kiyosaki, these are perceptions that breed from ignorance (37). Firstly, owning a business implies that a person is keen on learning how to be self-reliant. As stated in the book, a business owner will tend to engage in greater learning opportunities on how to optimize returns from investments (Kiyosaki 60). The cynical attitude by poor people who do not care to make investments towards financial independence is in essence the epitome of laziness. Poor persons are too slothful to consider that the greatest asset is time. Unfortunately, is nonrenewable in nature implying that the earlier one seeks to attain financial literacy the earlier they will begin earning the real benefits of creating and saving money as opposed to spending it. Kiyosaki fail to understand that there are employed people who have developed the art of investing in ventures that bring passive income and there are also businesspeople who never expand their businesses.
Many people consider their homes as a primary asset. Many people take up mortgages but as witnessed in the past financial recessions, they became massive liabilities (Kiyosaki 53). An asset is one that continuously earns money as opposed to demanding it. The rich dad lived a frugal life that ensured he did not commit continually committed less to paying for liabilities. In this way, the money he created did not go into paying for unnecessary bills but rather into more investments that ensured a growing passive income. Financial literacy is illustrated as a very straightforward understanding of how to create wealth without using it to things that do not add more wealth such as luxury goods (Kiyosaki 45). Borrowing to pay for liabilities is the greatest error that the poor make while the rich appreciate that learning new ways to make money is fundamental to making informed risks.


Works Cited
Kiyosaki, Robert T. Rich Dad, Poor Dad: What the Rich Teach Their Kids about Money -- that the Poor and Middle Class Do Not! Plata Publishing, 2014.
Lynch, Peter. Beating the Street. Simon and Schuster, 2012.